Tuesday, 19 May Globalization is not global westernization according to Amartya Sen in his article “How to judge globalism”. There is no time. Amartya Sen. “How to Judge Globalism”. Many critics see globalization as a western curse. But in fact it is not one way (west to east) nor is it necessarily a curse. In the article “How to Judge Globalism,” Amartya Sen provides a history of globalism. She talks how globalization is a two way street where in.

Author: Meztilabar Doulrajas
Country: Montserrat
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 2 June 2016
Pages: 215
PDF File Size: 8.18 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.1 Mb
ISBN: 535-8-63125-638-1
Downloads: 59299
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Moogulkree

Hello! Welcome to the Resource Centre.

Global policies have a role here in helping the development of national institutions for example, through defending democracy and supporting schooling and health facilitiesbut there is also a need to re-examine the adequacy of global institutional arrangements themselves.

To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policyincluding cookie policy. The globapism inequalities include disparities in affluence and also gross asymmetries in political, social, and economic opportunities and power. Over thousands of years, globalization has contributed to the progress of the world through travel, trade, migration, spread of cultural influences, and dissemination of knowledge and understanding including that of science and technology.

About project SlidePlayer Terms of Service. In the years to follow, the British focused on teaching english to Indians after scraping the local mediums to teaching.

That is the problem to be tackled. In the nineteenth century, this debate fitted into a broader controversy about Western education versus indigenous Indian education.

How to Judge Globalism – ArticlesReviewed

And more recently in East Asia, remarkable reductions in poverty have been achieved by countries which have opened up to global markets and knowledge. There is a nicely stylized history in which the globalis developments happened in Europe: It is, in fact, neither new nor necessarily Western; and it is not a curse. That shallow question is easy to answer, because it is hard to achieve economic prosperity without making extensive amartyaa of the opportunities of exchange and specialization that market relations offer.


It is not sufficient to understand that the poor of the world need globalization as much as the rich do; it is also important to make sure that they actually get what they need. Goobalism book, Vajracchedika Prajnaparamitasutra sometimes referred to as “The Diamond Sutra”is an old treatise on Buddhism; it was translated into Chinese from Sanskrit amartyya the fifth century by Kumarajiva, a half-Indian and half-Turkish scholar who lived in a part of eastern Turkistan called Kucha but later migrated to China.

Gow has been amply established in empirical studies, market outcomes are massively influenced by public policies in education, epidemiology, land reform, microcredit facilities, appropriate legal protections, et cetera; and in each smartya these fields, there is work to be done through public action that can radically alter the outcome of local and global economic relations.

Ergo–the argument runs–globalization is not unfair to the poor: To reject the globalization of science and technology because it represents Western influence and imperialism would not only amount to overlooking global contributions–drawn from many different parts of the world–that lie solidly behind so-called Western science and technology, but would also be quite a daft practical decision, given the extent to which the whole world can benefit from the process.

For Sen, globalization is neither new, nor entirely western, nor a curse. And this is the source of the modern word sine. The pursuit of arms “pushing” gives them a continuing role in the escalation of military conflicts today–in Africa and elsewhere. This called for an outrage where in the Western imports were resisted altogether. These enabling conditions themselves depend critically on economic, social, and political institutions that operate nationally and swn.

The use ot the market economy is consistent with many different ownership patterns, resource availabilities, social opportunities, and rules of operation such as patent laws and antitrust regulations.

How to Judge Globalism”. Everyone is better off. Furthermore, as much as 68 percent of the American arms exports went to developing countries. The G-8 countries sold 87 percent of the total supply of arms exported in the entire world.

Most Related  ANSI EIA 649 PDF

Globalization is not global westernization according to Amartya Sen in his article “How to judge globalism”. Health and Human Sciences Economics and Health: Globalization deserves a reasoned defense, but it also needs reform.

There is also a need for more clarity in formulating the distributional questions.

Amarrya issues have been much discussed on their own, but we must also note how they fit into a general pattern of unhelpful arrangements that undermine what globalization could offer. My presentations Profile Feedback Log out. But it would be a great mistake to see globalization primarily as a feature of imperialism.

The concept had traveled amartyya circle–from India, and then back. Indeed, Europe would have been a lot poorer–economically, culturally, and scientifically–had it resisted the globalization of mathematics, science, and technology at that time.

Certainly, the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, and the Industrial Revolution were great achievements–and they occurred mainly in Europe and, later, in America. The decimal system emerged and became well developed in India between the second and sixth centuries; it was used by Arab mathematicians soon thereafter. But the attempt to base the castigation of economic globalization on this rather thin ice produces a peculiarly fragile critique.

Home Ti Blogs Tapped: Share buttons are a little bit lower.

How to Judge Globalism

Sen’s article is designed to address the arguments of the anti-globalization movement. Rather, the main issue is how to make good use of the remarkable benefits of economic intercourse and technological progress in a way that pays adequate attention to the interests of the deprived sfn the underdog. Again, the real issue is the distribution of globalization’s benefits.